The 
            Andrei Rublev House
          In 
            1992 Simon was commissioned to design a beachfront house an hour's 
            drive from Melbourne. He explains how it unfolded: 
            
            In 1966 Andrei Tarkovsky made his film 'Andrei Rublev' loosely based 
            on the life of the fifteenth century icon painter of that name who 
            became unhappy with his role painting murals in churches. His concern 
            was that the main purpose of the images seemed to be to intimidate 
            the people, rather than to celebrate the gospel. The film depicts 
            an invasion of the city of Vladimir by Tatars, and scenes of a plague 
            and of the repression of pagans engaged in a ritual. After Rublev 
            killed an invader who was attacking a simple girl he became so disillusioned 
            with the world that he decided that he would quit painting, and would 
            no longer speak. Twelve years later he met a boy who was asked by 
            the authorities to make a giant bell, as his father who was a bell-maker 
            had died. The boy, who knew little of bell-making, nonetheless agreed 
            and embarked on the long and difficult path of rediscovering his father's 
            methods. When the bell was made, and rang out over the land, Andrei 
            Rublev was reduced to tears of admiration and renounced his vows, 
            adopting the boy and beginning again to paint icons. 
            
            A year after I saw this film I was approached by Peter and Gabriela 
            Rose who had bought a vacant block of land at Shoreham with beach 
            frontage. They had prepared a plan and wanted me to turn it into a 
            house design.It is hard for an architect to take a two-dimensional 
            diagram and turn it into something three-dimensional because the usual 
            process it to conceive of a house in three dimensions. A horizontal 
            section through this is then called a plan. Nonetheless I did not 
            want to disregard their request. They wanted to build in stone. I 
            found this a difficulty because stonework carries such strong connotations, 
            either relating to ancient buildings or alternatively Modernist works 
            with plain stone walls. What could an architect do when faced with 
            all these constraints? 
            
            Contemplating stone construction led me to remember the film, which 
            contains bold images of stone churches and monasteries. I felt that 
            my clients carried a sense of seriousness that aligned with this beautiful 
            film. At a practical level, I realised that if I represented scenes 
            from the film in the stonework and roof forms of the house, I could 
            use their plan to organise a dream-like sequence of these images. 
            You have often heard the term 'the film of the book'. Well, this attempts 
            to be a 'building of the film'! 
            
            A short time after the house was completed Peter Rose died of cancer. 
            In reflecting on the sadness of this, I am reassured to think that 
            the house is based on a philosophical film of thoughtfulness and depth, 
            and that these qualities permeate the building.